logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.03.24 2014고단3293
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 10, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of one million won by a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Seoul Central District Court on November 10, 2008, and on October 14, 201, the Defendant violated the prohibition provision on drinking under the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (doing Vehicles) and the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (hereinafter “Aggravated Punishment, etc.”) at the same court on October 14, 201, by being sentenced to a suspended sentence of four years for a violation of the

1. On September 5, 2014, the Defendant driven the said benz car under the influence of alcohol content of 0.243% without obtaining a driver’s license from a road where it is impossible to identify the Western-dong route of Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government around 09:15 on September 5, 2014 to the road in front of the same Gosan 11-ro.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Ch.A.) (C.) was operated by the Defendant at a temporary border, such as Paragraph 1, and the Defendant proceeded with the east T. B., along the three-lane roads of five lanes in front of Mapo-gu, toward the east of the East T. B. At the boundary of the Hong T.D.

In this case, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to take the front side and left side well and to accurately manipulate the steering and brakes so as to prevent accidents in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded in two-lanes of the same direction, which was driven by the victim E, as well as the lower part on the left side of the instant Benz’s car.

Ultimately, even though the Defendant damaged the damaged vehicle by occupational negligence as above, it was immediately stopped and operated without taking necessary measures, such as dealing with accidents, and thereby, escaped.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement of G and E;

1. The actual survey report on traffic accidents;

arrow