1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B: (a) the buildings listed in paragraph 1 of the attached list;

B. Defendant C shall set out in attached list 2.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is the Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Housing Redevelopment Improvement Project Association (hereinafter “instant project”) that completed the establishment registration on July 21, 2010 with the approval of the establishment from the head of Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on July 19, 2010 for the purpose of implementing the Housing Redevelopment Improvement Project (hereinafter “instant project”).

B. Defendant B and E are the owners of each of the relevant buildings listed in paragraphs 1 and 4 of the attached Table 1 in the project zone of this case and their site, who became a person subject to cash settlement because they did not apply for parcelling-out within the period of application for parcelling-out as notified by the Plaintiff, and Defendant C and D respectively leased and possessed the relevant buildings listed in paragraphs 2 and 3 of the attached Table.

C. On August 30, 2018, the Plaintiff obtained authorization from the head of Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on the management and disposal plan for the instant project, and the head of Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government publicly announced the plan as G publicly announced on September 6, 2018.

The Plaintiff filed an application with the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Regional Land Expropriation Committee for expropriation of each of the relevant buildings and their lots listed in attached Tables 1 and 4 to Defendant B and E, and on July 26, 2019, the said Committee decided on September 27, 2019 on the commencement date of expropriation of the above buildings and their lots owned by Defendant B and E.

On September 19, 2019, the Plaintiff deposited KRW 233,086,70 as deposited by Defendant E as deposited, and KRW 463,91,940 as deposited by Defendant B as deposited on September 26, 2019, respectively.

[Reasons for Recognition] Defendant B, C, and E: Each entry of evidence Nos. 1 through 5, 7, 8, 10, and 11 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), as a whole, and Defendant D’s purport of the whole pleadings: A confession pursuant to Article 150(3) and (1) of the Civil Procedure Act

2. According to the main sentence of Article 81(1) of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter “Urban Improvement Act”), the cause of the claim is in redevelopment projects.