The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the summary of the grounds for appeal in this case’s sentencing conditions, the lower court’s imprisonment (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant is a favorable condition to the defendant that the defendant repents his/her criminal act through a three-month period of detention, that the defendant's health and economic conditions are not good, that four children are raised, that the mother is supporting, that the defendant's husband and children want to take the action against the defendant, and that the defendant's husband and children want to take the action against the defendant.

However, in light of the fact that the crime of this case was committed on two occasions with the knowledge that the defendant was to be used in the crime of Bophishing, the crime of this case is committed by aiding and abetting the victim 3 to commit the crime of Bophishing fraud in which the amount of defraudation reaches 30,50,888 won by transferring passbooks and physical cards, and then withdrawing 2,510,000 won of money remitted to his own account after then, and embezzlement, etc., the crime of this case was significantly poor; the victims did not have been recovered; the victims did not agree with the victims; the same crime was not committed two times; the same criminal record was punished by a fine; and other various matters prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, which are the conditions for sentencing, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, and environment, the sentence against the defendant is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.