1. The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for one year;

2. Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year;

provided, however, that the above judgment has become final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A on April 10, 2015, the Seoul Central District Court received two years of suspended execution and a fine of four million won on August 18, 2015 for a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. at the Seoul Central District Court, which became final and conclusive on April 18, 2015.

Defendant

A is the owner of the business who operates the 'E' of a sexual traffic business establishment by leasing the 2nd floor in Bupyeong-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City D, and the defendant B pays part of the rent of the store and the profits of the business establishment to A, appropriates the operating expenses of the business establishment with the remaining profits, and operates the said 'E' overall.

At around 22:30 on August 18, 2015, the Defendants jointly installed CCTV in preparation for the police control at the above “E” business site, and arranged for the waiting room for two female employees. The Defendants received the price for sexual traffic of 80,000 won or 100,000 won for each course from the unspecified number of male customers who promised to use the Internet or business cell phones, and the Defendant, who is female employees of the Thailand, made the G three times and three times of sexual traffic from around June 2015 to August 18, 2015, and arranged sexual traffic by having her Korean nationality women engage in sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. Defendant B’s legal statement

1. Partial statement of the witness B (as to the defendant A)

1. Each prosecutor's suspect interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol against Defendant A (excluding the part of the statement made to Defendant A);

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol of F, G, and H;

1. A written statement of I;

1. Lease contract;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Field photographs, etc.;

1. The defendant A did not directly participate in the referral of sexual traffic in this case, the inquiry report (A), investigation report (Attachment to a judgment of the same kind for a suspect A), two copies of the judgment, and the defendant A's defense counsel in the summary order, and therefore, the defendant A did not directly participate in the referral of sexual traffic in this case, not the joint principal offender of sexual traffic, but the