logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.11.30 2017고단6443
마약류관리에관한법률위반(대마)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Despite the fact that the Defendant is not a narcotics handler, the Defendant treated marijuana as follows:

1. On April 2017, the Defendant taken marijuana by eating marijuana c or 302 at the Defendant’s home located in the Young-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the Defendant taken it by eating marijuana c or scook containing marijuana ingredients.

2. The defendant in possession of marijuana: 10:30 on May 23, 2017;

approximately 0.21g was carried by inserting about 0.21g in one's own bank and placing them in the west of the above defendant's house.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Investigation report (report on voluntary accompanying of the suspect);

1. Each protocol of seizure;

1. A report on investigation (Attachment of photographs of the room of seized articles), photographs of seized articles;

1. Notification of the results of each legal chemical appraisal and appraisal report;

1. Investigation report (Attachment of mobile phone analysis data);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (calculated an additional collection charge);

1. Relevant Article of the Act on the Management of Narcotics, etc., and Articles 61 (1) 4 (a) and 3 subparagraph 10 (a) (the point of intake marijuana) of the Act on the Management of Narcotics, etc., and Articles 61 (1) 6 and 4 (1) 2 (the point of holding marijuana even if the person is not a handler of narcotics) of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc., and the choice of imprisonment for each of them;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following circumstances considered in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. The proviso to Article 67 of the Narcotics Control Act;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order [the scope of each recommended sentence] The basic area (8 to 1 year and 6 months) (the final sentencing range due to the addition that there is no person subject to a special sentencing] of types 2 (math, d., e., e.) medication, simple possession, etc. (the scope of each recommended sentence]. The final sentencing range due to the addition that there is no person subject to a special sentencing: The ordinary circumstances that are favorable to the detection of marijuana ingredients both at the urine and her hair: The fact that both of the urine and her hair were found to have been detected: The fact that there are no other criminal records except for the case that the fine was paid twice, and that there is no other criminal records.

arrow