logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2021.02.17 2020고단6146
사기
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B On November 13, 2014, the Seoul Southern District Court sentenced three months of imprisonment with prison labor and two years and three months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act, respectively, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on January 19, 2015.

Defendant

B was CV SP borrower, Defendant A is a person who works for a daily occupation, and the Defendants are between friendlys.

Defendant

B At the end of April 2014, Defendant A was released at the maturity of detention due to the arrest of the inside and after the trial at the location of the end of April 2014.

In the two months, a person who is obligated to repay the vehicle in full shall lend the vehicle as security to another person, and the defendant A consented to this and raised the vehicle of the defendant B as security.

Defendant

A around May 13, 2014, at Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D, shows the above Nex vehicles to victims E, and "in the Republic of Korea, A is proceeding with B.

A loan of KRW 10,00,000,000 is required to be paid after two months of the loan.

It is intended to transfer the name of the vehicle in lieu of the repayment of money.

The phrase “the phrase was false.”

However, in fact, Defendant B was detained on the charge of violating the Act on the Promotion of the Game Industry on January 2014, and was released at the expiration of the detention period and was tried to do so, it was difficult for Defendant B to have been under economic circumstances to the extent that the house was delayed due to the lack of a certain import. While Defendant B was established a collateral security right on the above NAS vehicle, Defendant B did not have the intent and ability to fully repay the obligation of the said collateral security and transfer the vehicle. Defendant B did not intend to conduct the business or have attempted to conduct the business. Defendant A was only liable for the amount of KRW 20 million, but there was no certain import or property.

Nevertheless, the Defendants conspired to induce the victim as above and received 3.4 million won from the G bank account (H) in the name of the witness F designated by Defendant A on the same day from the victim, and transferred 3.4 million won to the I Association account in the name of Defendant B.

arrow