beta
Text
1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Reasons
1. On January 31, 2012, D, the plaintiffs' assertion, filed for registration of the establishment of chonsegwon with the Changwon District Court No. 2364 regarding the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter "the instant real estate") to the defendant on January 31, 2012.
However, the defendant only caused the registration of the right to lease on a deposit basis, but actually did not have the right to lease on a deposit basis, and the duration of chonsegwon has expired.
The plaintiffs seek to cancel the registration of the establishment of the right to lease on a deposit basis as the heir of D.
2. In the judgment, there is no evidence to view that the defendant only caused the registration of chonsegwon without the right to lease on a deposit basis, and there is no ground to view that the defendant's right to lease on a deposit basis has expired.
Therefore, the plaintiffs' assertion is without merit.
3. Therefore, the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.