Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 1, 2016, around 13:45, the Defendant: (a) destroyed property damage at the “D” marina shop operated by the victim C in Yongsan-gu Seoul, Yongsan-gu, Seoul; (b) caused the disturbance by the Defendant’s wife E, and caused the Defendant’s failure to return home to Korea; and (c) destroyed the number of flowers trees 7 to which the market price, the victim’s wife E, could not be known.

2. In the same time and place as in paragraph 1, the injured Defendant inflicted injury on the Defendant’s wife E, such as putting the head debt of the Defendant’s wife up, making the victim’s face up with drinking and hand-on, and making the victim enter the bar and hole up.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol concerning suspect interrogation of C;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs damaged by fire, and images of the upper part of the victim E;

1. Relevant Article 36 of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. On May 4, 2016, the Defendant for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, who was sentenced to two years of suspension of the execution of imprisonment with labor for interference with business, etc. at the Seoul Western District Court on May 12, 2016, which became final and conclusive on May 12, 2016, and committed each of the instant crimes even during the current suspension of execution, there is a need to strictly punish the Defendant. However, in light of the fact that the Defendant recognized all of the instant crimes and divided his mistake, the amount of damage to property is not significant, and the victim E is the Defendant’s wife, it is so decided as per Disposition.