logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2014.06.25 2013고단1837
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than five months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Power” On December 31, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. at the Seoul Central District Court on September 25, 2009, and the execution of the sentence was completed on September 25, 2009. On February 18, 2011, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced five months of imprisonment for a crime of assault at the Seoul Central District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 23, 2012.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On August 12, 2010, the Defendant: (a) around 11:00, issued a false certificate of employment in the name of representative director G, a certificate of employment (employment), a certificate of employment (employment), and a written employment contract by the Defendant, despite being aware of the fact that the document, which is a private document pertaining to rights, obligations, or certification of fact, was forged by “D Credit Union” located in Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-gu.

At around 14:00 on August 12, 2010, the Defendant submitted an application for a loan under the name of the Defendant to H, an employee in charge of lending the said union, who is aware of such forgery, and subsequently submitted the forged document as if it were the document duly formed.

2. Around 14:00 on August 12, 2010, the Defendant concluded that “AD Credit Union was paid KRW 1,500,000 per month when working at the home (BF). The Defendant borrowed KRW 6 million as the year loan for the year loan, and that the Defendant would repay the loan by means of equal installment of principal, etc. for five years.”

However, the fact is that the defendant did not work in F, did not have a certain occupation, and even if he did not receive the above loan due to the lack of income or property, he did not have the intent or ability to repay the loan.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving H, received 6 million won of the loan from the “D Credit Union” to the passbook (Account Number: I) in the name of the Defendant from the “D Credit Union,” which is the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the accused in the first protocol of trial;

1. The police of H. H.

arrow