1. The Defendant connects the Plaintiff with the indication 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1 of the attached drawings among the real estate 1 floor listed in the attached list in sequence.

As the Plaintiff’s assertion and determination party’s assertion have expired on June 3, 2014, the term of the lease agreement concluded on June 3, 2014 (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”) with respect to the portion of the real estate indicated in the separate sheet No. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1 (hereinafter “instant real estate”). As the Plaintiff and the Defendant acquired the ownership of the instant real estate on March 3, 2014, the Defendant is entitled to demand renewal of the lease for five years from March 3, 2014 under the Commercial Building Lease Protection Act, and thus, the Defendant cannot comply with the Plaintiff’s request for extradition.

Judgment

In light of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the defendant leased the leased portion of this case on March 10, 201 to March 31, 2013.

In regard to this, the Defendant shall not later than five years after the lapse of five years from March 3, 2014, for which the Plaintiff newly acquired the ownership of the instant real estate.