A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 24, 2015, the Defendant against the victim D was making repayment to the victim of the “F” office operated by the victim D in the following City E around the following day: (a) the Defendant borrowed the victim KRW 50 million from the victim’s “F office” office in the following cities: (b) the Defendant was making repayment to the victim.

By the late October 12, 190, repayment will be made and high interest will be made.

“A false statement” was made.

However, at the time, the Defendant had been in short of funds to the employees of G Co., Ltd. who had been operated by the Defendant, and there was no intention or ability to repay even if he/she borrowed money from the injured party due to a debt of at least KRW 400 million.

The Defendant received 50 million won from the victim to the national bank account in the name of the Defendant on the same day.

2. On September 29, 2015, the Defendant’s fraud against the Victim H via I at the mutual infinite coffee shop located in the Yasan-si, Yasan-si on September 29, 2015, and then leased KRW 72,00,000,000,000,000, including the interest in the day.

“A false representation was made.”

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the damages even if he borrowed the money from the damaged person on the grounds of Paragraph 1.

The Defendant received 72 million won from the injured party to the new bank account in the name of the wife of I on the same day.

3. On October 3, 2015, the Defendant against the victim J is urgently required to pay money to the victim J at the “L” coffee shop located in K in the following cities:

The phrase “one-day loan of 20 million won is changed,” which is a place of money raising within 3 days.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the damages even if he borrowed the money from the damaged person on the grounds of Paragraph 1.

The Defendant received KRW 20 million from the damaged party to the account in the name of the Defendant on the same day.

Accordingly, the defendant was informed of the victims to receive property.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's person;