logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2018.02.02 2017고정258
도로법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. A trucking vehicle operating on roads shall pass through the lane or place where a loading quantity measuring device is installed for the purpose of measuring the loading volume;

In such cases, a truck for measuring the load load shall pass through the measuring equipment of the load load at a speed not exceeding ten kilometers.

Nevertheless, on June 15, 2016, the Defendant violated the provision at the place of business of the south-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-si, the 27-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-si, and obstructed the measurement of vehicle load by passing

2. The road management agency has committed an act to obstruct the measurement of vehicle load, such as operating devices of a vehicle by a driver;

If it is determined, re-measurement may be requested.

In this case, the driver of the vehicle shall comply with it unless there is any justifiable reason, but the defendant did not comply with the request of the person in charge of the vehicle re-check to check the violation at the same time and place as the above paragraph (1) without any justifiable reason.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Investigation report (verification of the owner of a vehicle in the Do);

1. Investigation report (verification of details of accusation to the accuser);

1. A written accusation;

1. A written accusation;

1. A statement of particulars of accusation;

1. Evidential documents;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to certify limited vehicles;

1. Subparagraph 5 of Article 115 of the Road Act, Article 78 (3) of the Act (the point of interference with measuring loading capacity), subparagraph 6 of Article 115 of the Road Act, and Article 78 (2) (the point of failing to comply with the request for re-measurement of loading capacity) of the relevant Act on criminal facts;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

arrow