logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.09.03 2020고정389
상해
Text

The defendant is innocent.

Reasons

1. On September 25, 2019, the Defendant: (a) around 18:00 on September 25, 2019, while carrying out the work of replacing the locking devices referred to in subparagraph (C) in front of subparagraph (B) of the Seoul Jung-gu Seoul Central District Office with the locking devices used at the D hotel, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, such as chest fluor, which requires approximately three weeks of treatment on the part of the victim, to enter the scene in order to stop this.

2. Determination

A. The victim stated that “a person who assaults himself/herself in the police shall be able to see and memory his/her face frequently.”

On December 12, 2019, the victim argued that “A is an employee who has been present at the time of the prosecution’s appearance in the criminal conciliation proceedings and who has attended as a suspect” at the time of the defendant’s appearance, “A is an employee who has been present at the end of 30 major buildings management uniforms. The face is not examined. A in-person who is currently face A is not an offender, but a perpetrator is changed.”

B. If CCTV video images submitted to the prosecution were related to the situation in which the victim was injured at the time, 10 persons, including the defendant, were gathered in front of the guest room C for the work of replacing lock devices at the time, and the victim who was late at the next stage was trying to closely approach the gap where the above people gather in order to see the work of replacing lock devices, and the defendant who was living in that place was trying to stop the victim's access, is confirmed, but it is not clearly confirmed if the defendant was elbowd with his elbow.

C. Although there is no room for the Defendant to keep the victim her her butt to constitute an assault, the facts charged that the Defendant her blue was sealed by selling his her blue cannot be deemed to have been proven without any reasonable doubt, and the facts charged that the Defendant suffered the victim’s her blue injury in light of the video of the above CCTV also her blue.

3...

arrow