1. The plaintiff's respective claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a person working as the chairperson of the Association D (hereinafter “instant Association”). Defendant B (hereinafter “Defendant E”) is a newspaper enterpriser who publishes a daily newspaper “E”, and Defendant C is an online newspaper enterpriser who operates F.

B. On June 24, 2017, Defendant E posted the following articles (hereinafter “instant article”) on the E Saturdays “G” page C3.

“5억 짜리” “가짜” H, 과연 쇼였나 감정가 5억 도자기 매병ㆍ2억짜리 ‘게 연적’ 진위 논란의 진실은 문화재의 유래와 가치를 살펴보는 I 장수 프로그램 H에서 감정가 5억 원을 받은 도자기 매병(梅甁)과 2억 원으로 감정받은 연적(硯滴)에 대해 고미술시장에서 진위논란이 일고 있다.

H Appraisal Board and D, an incorporated association which appraised the relevant work before broadcasting, claims that the work is a good, while some of the high art award claims that it is a fake.

(m) At the personnel dong of the materials that had already returned to the personnel dong, “The actual results of the year of each branch from the broadcast in fact” could only show ancient art awards.

The Korean High Art Award stated that “I had appraised sick's disease, but did not make any transaction because I judged it as a mother's work.”

In addition, another ancient art award referred to as “the JC had been found with a studio studio” and referred to as “the studio would die in KRW 20 million upon receipt of a written appraisal of goods in D,” and that the studio would have received an appraisal of KRW 200 million.”

This article examines that the disease is fake or low in value.

(m) was not a superior to the world.

(A) In the broadcast, KC evaluated the two objects in the broadcast “(m) shall not be deemed to be fake or unvalueed on the ground that (a) the high art works that have not been seen as gold have taken place.”

D is determined by the Association of November 28th of the year in the case of an injury or disease, and the results are as follows.