logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 논산지원 2018.05.18 2018고정24
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동감금)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

C for the reason that the victim D(20) opened a cell phone in the name of this C and settled a small amount of money, C was born with E and the Defendant to find the victim together with E and the Defendant to leave the vehicle for confinement.

C On August 14, 2017, at around 02:00, the victim was found in front of the GPC room located in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul. Around 02:00, the victim instructed E and the Defendant to be on board the vehicle, leading the victim, leading the victim on the vehicle, and the victim “I am aware that the weather s would be safe.”

Hashea Hashea Hashea Hashea et al.

“In doing so, the victim’s flaps were flabed onto the wall, E was flabed with the victim’s hand, and flabed the victim on the back side of the Hrocketing vehicle owned by the Defendant, and the Defendant was able to prevent the victim from getting out of the said vehicle, and C was flabed with the driver’s seat, and C was driving the said vehicle for about five minutes on the said vehicle.

Accordingly, the Defendant, together with C and E, detained the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E by the prosecution;

1. Each police statement made to I, D, J, and K [the defendant and his defense counsel] that there was no conspiracy of the defendant for confinement with C, E or any instruction given by C, and there was no intention of confinement;

The argument is asserted.

However, the Defendant was aware of a plan to receive money or to make a cargo in return for finding a victim whose contact was cut off by C, E and vehicles, and found the victim, and, upon finding the victim, E and the Defendant had access to the victim subject to C’s direction and had been able to bring the victim up, it can be recognized that there was a public collusion relationship with the Defendant, C, and E on the ground that there was an intention to put the victim up the victim up, with the Defendant, C, and E, who was listed on the back of the vehicle remaining on the back of the vehicle.

【Recognition】

Application of Statutes

1. The relevant Article of the Act concerning the crime and the choice of punishment, etc.;

arrow