Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On January 17, 2014, the defendant was sentenced to a summary order of a fine of four million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Cheongju District Court on January 17, 201, and the records of the same crime are added once.
1. The Defendant violates the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) is a person who is engaged in driving a B rocketing car.
On June 13, 2020, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 01:19, and got straight from the “F cafeteria” side of the Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, in the vicinity of the two-lane road in the Cheongju-si, Seo-gu, Cheongju-si.
In such cases, a driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the steering system and steering gear with the driver of a motor vehicle.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so while under the influence of alcohol content 0.05% in blood and neglected to do so, and forced the victim H (Y, 28 years old) who was placed in the opposite line with the central separation unit that was damaged by shocking the central separation unit, to shocked with the vehicle of the victim H (Y, 28 years old) driver.
As a result, the Defendant suffered, by negligence, the injury to the victim, such as salt ties and tensions that require approximately two weeks of treatment, and the injury to the victim I (the victim remaining and aged 27) who is the passenger of the victimized vehicle for about two weeks of treatment.
2. On June 13, 2020, the Defendant driven a B rocketing car as described in paragraph (1) in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of about 0.05% in the section of about 4km from the Do near the K cafeteria located in the jurisdiction of the Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si to the front road of the Cheongju-gu, Seowon-si.
Accordingly, the Defendant violated the prohibition of drinking alcohol driving regulations not less than twice.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. He/she shall make inquiries about the actual condition of the police statement report to H, on-site photographs, each diagnosis report, and previous records of the judgment on the detection of the primary driver: a response to inquiries, such as criminal history;