logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.05.25 2016고단1145
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From February 27, 2016 to March 2, 2016, the Defendant provided “C” with facilities necessary for sexual traffic between Osan City and Osan City, and operated “C” by employing female employees. The Defendant provided female employees with 1.20,000 won for unspecified male customers who found the place for sexual traffic and provided them with sexual intercourse with customers.

Accordingly, the defendant arranged sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense, and selection of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act to order observation of protection [the scope of recommendation] 19 years of age or older / There is no person who has a special sentencing [the person who has been sentenced to sentencing] in the basic area (6 months to 1 year and 4 months) such as brokerage, etc. of sexual traffic in the sexual traffic crimes subject to 19 years of age or older / [the decision of sentencing] 8 months, the suspension of execution 2 years, despite the fact that the defendant was punished by a fine for the same kind of crime in the past in the past, it is reasonable to ask him/her for a serious crime committed in the past. However, it is only limited to the operating period, and the scale of business is small (one female employee) and the defendant seems not to have a substantial profit gained by the defendant. It is so decided as per Disposition in consideration of all the sentencing reasons.

arrow