A fine of KRW 2,00,000 shall be imposed on each of the 1 and 2 frauds set forth in the judgment of the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

1. [2016 High Doz. 838] On August 22, 2013, the Defendant made a false call to the victim B at an influent place on August 22, 2013, stating that “The price on the day following the day on which a consortium is installed is installed on the logistics transfer machinery for the factory located in Gyeongbuk-si C at the time of residing in Gyeongbuk-si.”

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the price immediately even if he was to install a consortium because of the difficulties in the corporate situation at the time.

Defendant deceiving the victim as above and caused the victim to install a consortium machine equivalent to KRW 2,436,480 on August 31, 2013.

2. [2016 High Court Decision 848] The Defendant stated that the facts charged in the Victim F is “victim” only in the case of the Victim F in the case of the E located in the Southern G, South Korea on September 4, 2014, but according to the records, the facts charged are corrected ex officio to the extent that it does not interfere with the Defendant’s exercise of right to defense.

The telephone calls to the destination and calls to pay the transportation fee of KRW 2.40,000,00.

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the transport charges.

Nevertheless, the Defendant had the victim obtain economic benefits equivalent to the amount of the said amount due to the Defendant’s failure to pay KRW 240,000,000 to the G vehicle at around 17:10 on the same day, and the Defendant had the victim operate from the I to the E in Daegu North-gu H, Daegu, to pay KRW 90,000.

3. [Attachment 2016 High Court 1007] On September 27, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for six months and two years of suspended execution for fraud at the Daegu District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 20, 2013.

The defendant is (ju) the representative of J, who is engaged in the installation of the embankment, and the victim K is the person who manufactures, supplies, and distributes pumps as the representative of L (ju).

On January 3, 2013, the Defendant called the victim at the scopic land and sent the scopic pumps to the scopic line after one week, the Defendant would give approval from the scopic Doz. (State).