The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal did not err by misapprehending the fact that the Defendant had inflicted injury on the victim by exercising the force of force, such as breath, etc. of the victim.

2. According to the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below, the victim stated in the initial investigation process that "in the course of the initial investigation that he/she was faced with the body of the defendant on the ground that he/she was faced with one another on the road, he/she committed an assault, such as pressing his/her body, breath, etc.", and consistently maintained the above statement until the court below reaches the original judgment (see, e.g., records 13,45 pages, etc., 68 pages of the trial records), and there is no reasonable circumstance to suspect the credibility of the statement, and the statement at D's investigation agency and the court below (see, e.g., evidence records, 76 pages, etc., the trial records) that he/she observed the instant case at the time and at the time of the statement of the injury diagnosis statement are consistent with the victim's statement. Thus, the victim's dispute is likely to occur on the ground that

It can be sufficiently recognized that the victim has inflicted bodily injury by using violence, such as breathing, etc. of the victim.

Therefore, the lower court was justifiable to have convicted of the facts charged of this case.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.