The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the summary of the grounds for appeal in this case, the punishment imposed by the court below (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment is in favor of the defendant, under agreement with the victim of the crime of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective injury with a deadly weapon, etc.), that the victim is not subject to the punishment of the defendant, violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes), violation of the Road Traffic Act, and special larceny crimes, and that the defendant reflects his mistake. However, these circumstances seems to have been sufficiently taken into account at the court below, and there is no special change in circumstances that may change the sentence of the court below. There is no negligence on the victims of the traffic accident in this case due to shock of the damaged vehicle stopped by the suspension signal. The vehicle operated by the defendant was not covered by the comprehensive motor vehicle insurance, as well as liability insurance, and the defendant is driving the vehicle of this case without a license even though he had a history of punishment for driving without

In full view of the fact that the victim escaped from the accident and agreed with the victim of the crime of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective action, deadly weapon, etc.), but the nature of the crime was excessive that the victim her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her hand

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the defendant's appeal is groundless.