beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
As a taxi engineer, the defendant is a Dostststa taxi vehicle owned by the Youngbu Co., Ltd. and a person driving the E-Sa car owned by the defendant.
The Defendant used the fact that the Defendant is responsible for the negligence on the part of the other party against the vehicles that want to change the vehicle line or the vehicles that make a left-hand turn to the left-hand turn, thereby inducing a traffic accident intentionally against the said vehicles by pretending to cause a traffic accident and making a false report to the insurance company of the other party to the accident as if the vehicle was involved in a traffic accident due to the negligence of the other party to the accident.
On November 6, 2009, the Defendant discovered the change of the vehicle from the DB cafeteria operated by the DB cafeteria in front of the DB cafeteria located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on the day before the DB cafeteria, and could avoid the collision, but intentionally conflict, and received a false accident as if it was a traffic accident caused by the DC’s negligence on the same day.
Accordingly, the defendant is the same month from a person who is in charge of insurance money for a fire in the same household with the victim.
9. On March 9, 2009, the vehicle repair cost of KRW 3,50,00, KRW 1,100,000 agreed around the 12th of the same month, and KRW 466,440 on the 17th of the same month, and acquired KRW 5,06,440 in total, and acquired KRW 5,06,440 on the 17th of the same month, and as a traffic accident occurred by intentionally causing an accident in the Japan and the Gyeonggi region from March 9, 2009 to July 19, 203 and caused damage by negligence, the vehicle repair cost of KRW 43,795,890 (Defendant 40,847,490, Youngbu enterprise, KRW 2,948,400) in total under the name of the victim’s fire, or the vehicle repair cost of KRW 43,795,890 on the 111st of the same month, by obtaining them by fraud.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Partial statement of the protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant;
1.DE, DF.