1. The defendant is paid KRW 30,000,000 from the plaintiff (Appointed Party) and simultaneously with the plaintiff (Appointed Party).

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the designated parties (hereinafter “Plaintiffs”) jointly own the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1 (hereinafter “instant building”).

B. On October 18, 2010 with the consent or delegation of the Plaintiffs, the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) agreed with the Defendant to receive approximately 30,000,000,000 deposit money for the first floor of the instant building at KRW 1,80,000, monthly rent, and the period from November 1, 2010 to December 24, 201, and agreed to receive monthly rent from the account in the name of the Appointer C (hereinafter “previous lease”) (hereinafter “previous lease”). From around that time, the Defendant used the part of the C dementia part of the instant building as delivery.

C. On September 27, 2014, the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the Defendant concluded a lease agreement with the following terms:

(hereinafter referred to as “instant lease contract”). O located in the instant building: A contract for extension under the Commercial Building Lease Protection Act (related to a five-year contract guarantee) is a condition used from November 1, 2014 to October 31, 2015 (one-year contract), and deposit amount is KRW 30,000,000, monthly rent is KRW 3,50,000.

- The lessee is the condition of delivering the commercial building in question to the lessor on October 31, 2015 in the condition of the facility delivered on November 1, 2010.

On May 27, 2015, the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) sent to the Defendant a document verifying the content that the instant lease agreement will expire as of October 31, 2015, and no longer has an intention to renew the lease agreement, and the Plaintiff’s restoration to the original state and request for clarification by the said time. The said document was sent to the Defendant under the same year.

5. 28. The defendant was sent to the defendant.

E. Of the present buildings of this case, the defendant is now indicated in the annexed Form 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 1 of the annexed Form 2.