beta
Text
All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.
Reasons
1. Summary of the Defendants’ grounds for appeal
A. The Defendants did not have committed any act deviating from the scope of the security service, such as misunderstanding of facts (the Defendants) by jointly or exerting influence on a residential intrusion.
B. The punishment of the lower judgment (Defendant A and B: fine of KRW 1 million; fine of KRW 500,000; fine of KRW 500,000) is too unreasonable.
2. Determination on the grounds for appeal
A. According to the determination of the assertion of mistake of facts (defendants) in the records of this case, E requested expenses to K (hereinafter “K”) to enter Mtel 107 occupied by the victim L corporation (hereinafter “instant office”). When K security guards, including the Defendants, went to the office of this case, the victim met the front of the office to prevent the victim from acquiring the right of possession of the said office; E, including the security guards, opened the office of this case for about 30 minutes before the office and opened the office and went to the office of this case by E, E, Ba Ba Ba Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha.).