The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal (a 2-year imprisonment, confiscation of seized articles, collection of 5050,000 won) is too unreasonable.

2. However, there are extenuating circumstances such as that the Defendant recognized the instant crime and divided his mistake, and that the Defendant contributed to the investigation of the narcotics crime.

However, the crime of this case is likely to be criticized in that the defendant sells, delivers, administers, or possesses phiphonephones without consideration, and the nature of the crime is not weak, and the amount of phiphones handled by the defendant is not smaller than the amount of the phiphones handled by the defendant, and the defendant has already been punished eight times due to drug crimes, and the defendant has committed the crime of this case without being aware of it even during the period of repeated crimes upon completion of the execution of the final sentence.

Considering the various circumstances, including the above circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive for committing a crime, and circumstances after committing a crime, the lower court’s sentence is too unreasonable.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.