The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (10 years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the judgment of the defendant led to a confession of the crime and repents of the mistake, that the defendant appears to have caused a contingent crime of this case by examining the victim suffering from dementia for three years, and that one of five other children of the victim other than the defendant, other than the defendant, wanting the defendant's preference, is favorable to the defendant.

However, while taking into account the above circumstances favorable to the defendant, the court below sentenced a punishment equivalent to the lower limit within the scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court in consideration of the fact that the nature of the crime in this case is very serious in considering the method of the crime in this case and the anti-humanity character, etc.

3. Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition