logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2015.07.17 2015구합2819
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

On July 7, 2010, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea on July 7, 2010, and applied for refugee status to the Defendant on February 22, 2013, which is six days before the expiration date of the period of stay ( February 28, 2013), after entering the Republic of Korea as a foreigner of the nationality of the Federia (hereinafter referred to as “Naria”).

The defendant, on February 19, 2014, promulgated with sufficient grounds for persecution (the Immigration Control Act (amended by Act No. 11298, Feb. 10, 2012; hereinafter the same shall apply)

) On the ground that Article 2 Subparag. 3 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees, Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees, and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees cannot be deemed to exist (hereinafter “instant disposition”), a disposition for non-recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

The Defendant filed an objection against the instant disposition with the Minister of Justice on April 1, 2014, but was dismissed on December 16, 2014.

[Based on recognition, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 1, and 2, and the purport of the entire pleadings of the instant disposition is legitimate. The plaintiff's assertion is sufficient to be a transfer report (Igbo) from Magian origin. On February 21, 2010, the plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's death. The plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff'

As can be seen, even though there is a risk that the Plaintiff would be stuffed on the ground of the status of a member of a specific social group, the Defendant did not recognize the Plaintiff as a refugee. The instant disposition is unlawful.

It shall be as shown in the attached Form of the relevant statutes.

Judgment

In order to be recognized as a "refugee" under Article 2 (3) of the Immigration Control Act, the relevant gambling shall be defined as "human race, religion, ethnicity, and specific, in addition to the requirement that the applicant for refugee status has a well-founded fear in his/her country of origin."

arrow