Text
1. The application for intervention by the defendant succeeding intervenor shall be dismissed;
2. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
3. The Plaintiff and the Plaintiff out of the appeal costs.
Reasons
Basic Facts
On January 15, 2008, the Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer under the name of the Defendant with respect to multi-family houses on the ground of 231.7 square meters (hereinafter “instant building”) on the ground of inheritance (consultation). On May 16, 2017, the Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer on the ground of sale as of May 15, 2017 to the Intervenor succeeding to the Defendant (hereinafter “ Intervenor”) on the said building. The Defendant entrusted the management of the instant building to the E who was engaged in real estate management business, etc. under the trade name “F” on July 10, 208, the Defendant entrusted the management of the instant building to the E who was engaged in the management of the instant building, such as the receipt of rents, cleaning services, public imposts, payment of public charges, the transfer management by proxy, and the lease contract.
“Forming the power of attorney (hereinafter referred to as “the power of attorney on July 10, 2008”) as the content
(A) On March 18, 2015, the Plaintiff and the Defendant drafted a receipt (hereinafter “the receipt of the instant lease contract”) under the Defendant’s name, stating that “The Plaintiff shall rent KRW 45 million with respect to the instant housing (hereinafter “instant housing”) from the Defendant, and the term of the contract from March 28, 2015 to March 28, 2017; and that KRW 30 million out of the deposit shall be paid by March 28, 2015 on the date of the contract, and the remainder of KRW 15 million shall be paid by March 28, 2015 (hereinafter “the instant lease contract”).
(A) On April 30, 2015, the Plaintiff deposited 15 million won in the deposit account in the name of E on April 30, 2015.
(A) No. 7-1 or 3. 【No. 7-1 or 3. 【No. 1 or 3. 【No. 1, No. 1, No. 3, No. 6, and No. 7-1 or No. 7-3, and the overall purport of the pleadings are examined as to whether the application for intervention by the defendant succeeding intervenor by succession is legitimate or not.
The lawsuit is pending before the court.