1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. In the course of the disposition, on April 16, 2017, the date of entry into the Republic of Korea of the People of the People of the Republic of Korea, a short-term sojourn status visit (C-3) on April 16, 2017 (hereinafter “instant disposition”) refugee status application (hereinafter “instant disposition”) and on May 2, 2017, the date of the application for refugee status recognition application, which was April 17, 2017: The fact that there is no dispute over the recognition of the decision of rejection on March 21, 2018 as of the date of the application for objection that there is no sufficient ground for recognition of refugee status: Gap’s evidence 1 through 4, Eul’s evidence 1, and 2, and the purport of the entire pleadings;

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion is a national of the People's Republic of China (hereinafter "China").

The plaintiff was trained in 2001.

The plaintiff is trained in 2010 and 2016 on two occasions.

The detention has been arrested and detained for one month, and the fine has been released.

The plaintiff has been in the Republic of Korea since he was arrested in the Chinese official territory on the ground that he did training of the patriarche, and has been in the Republic of Korea.

As such, the Plaintiff is likely to be stuffed by the Chinese government for the reason that he/she receives training of the patriarche in China, so the Plaintiff should be recognized as a refugee.

B. Determination 1) Article 2 Subparag. 1 of the Refugee Act defines refugee status as “any foreigner who is unable or does not want to be protected by the country of nationality due to well-founded fear to recognize that he/she may be injured on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group, or political opinion, or who is a stateless foreigner who is unable or does not want to return to the country in which he/she had resided before entering the Republic of Korea due to such fear.” 2) The aforementioned evidence and evidence as mentioned in the above-mentioned evidence and evidence Nos. 3, 4, and 5 are revealed by adding the whole purport of arguments to the arguments. In full view of the following circumstances, the Plaintiff’s race, religion, nationality, and specific description.