logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 영월지원 2014.02.07 2013고단453
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 29, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry in the Busan District Court’s Vice-Support, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on February 28, 201.

The defendant, along with C and one-person D, recruited to operate an illegal game room on October 2009, and then C and one-person D invested funds, and the defendant operated a game room by attracting customers as the head of the business, and divided the profits.

The Defendant and C and one-person D set up PC 36 games in each PC, which were not rated by the Game Rating Board. The Defendant and C and one-person D operated on the fourth floor of the building located in the Dong-si, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-gu, Gyeonggi-do, and the fourth floor from October 22, 2009 to October 27, 2009.

After that, the defendant C and one-person D received KRW 10,00 from customers in the money exchange room in the above game room and provided a charge card containing 10,000 won, and let customers gain the charge card in the PC, and let them play the substitute game, and when the same form of the game is suspended, if the same form of the game is coincide with the street, the game was provided to customers by the method of acquiring points. After that, when the customers want to make money exchange, 10% of the game money contained in the charge card in the above money exchange room was limited to the fee and exchanged in cash.

As a result, the defendant and C, one-person D, in collusion, provided game products that have not been rated by the Rating Board, displayed and stored for this purpose, and customers exchanged tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each interrogation protocol of the prosecution against F, C, and G;

1. Each statement of H and I;

1. Each protocol of seizure;

1. A lease contract;

1. Control note;

1. On-site;

arrow