logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.11.16 2017나36776
손해배상(자)
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the following additional judgment, and such reasoning is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The Plaintiff asserts that the period of payment of temporary layoff benefits against the Plaintiff is from July 31, 2015 to December 27, 2015, and from January 1, 2016 to September 11, 2016, and the amount in excess of the lost income during that period is not deducted from the lost income during another period. Thus, the Plaintiff asserts that only KRW 21,382,281, which constitutes the lost income during the said period of temporary layoff benefits, should be deducted from the actual income of the Plaintiff during the said period of payment.

However, according to the evidence and the purport of the oral argument as seen earlier, temporary layoff benefits equivalent to the period from July 31, 2015 to November 19, 2016 were paid to the Plaintiff. The sum of the amount of temporary layoff benefits corresponding to the period (25,388,500-1 m2 m1-2 m1-2 m2 1-2 m2 1-6 m2 12015-7 2015-7 312015-7 2015-127 2,846,700 0.00 43.958 0.0,000,000,000. 11,269,515 20-12-28-12, 2016-196, 1984, 205 16.45 16.65% of the total amount of temporary layoff benefits.

Therefore, this part of the plaintiff's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and all appeals by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow