1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning for this Court’s explanation concerning this part of the underlying facts is that the reasoning for the first instance judgment is the same as the corresponding part of the reasoning for the first instance judgment, except where “this Court” in Part 3 of the judgment of the first instance as “court of the first instance.”

2. Judgment on the main claim

A. The plaintiff asserts that the plaintiff primarily lends 12,6650,000 won to the defendant by means of transferring money to each financial account of the defendant, J, and L companies, such as the statement in the attached sheet of loans. Thus, the defendant is obligated to pay the above KRW 126,650,00 to the plaintiff.

In regard to this, the Defendant asserts to the effect that each of the money stated in the separate sheet was unjust for the Plaintiff’s claim for the return of the instant loan, which was premised on the Plaintiff’s loan to the Defendant, on the premise that the money was a loan to the Defendant, and was used for the Plaintiff’s bank account, mainly for the purpose of entry and exit related to Internet gambling.

B. 1) The Plaintiff’s new bank account (H; hereinafter “new bank account of this case”)

(2) Since June 30, 2011, when opening the account, D’s mobile phone was connected to mobile banking, the mobile banking was terminated on January 2, 2012, 2012. (2) D’s district court of Busan on July 20, 2012: (i) forged and events on the power of representation for the certificate of seal imprint in the Plaintiff’s name; (ii) assault against the Plaintiff, bodily injury, confinement, and indecent act by compulsion; and (iii) committed fraud against the other victims on December 5, 2013; and (iv) the said court rendered a judgment of not guilty of imprisonment for two years and six years.

2.3.