logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2016.02.04 2015구합1026
자동차운전면허취소처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On January 4, 1995, the Plaintiff acquired a Class 1 driver’s license for large vehicles.

B. On August 24, 2015, at around 21:30, the Plaintiff, while under the influence of alcohol of 0.060% in front of the 21:30-si, the Plaintiff was given the penalty points of 100 points and 30 points as the median line, to police officers who were under control while driving a CN-si car with an illegal internship, and were found to have been exposed to an illegal internship.

C. On September 4, 2015, the Defendant revoked the Plaintiff’s Class 1 driver’s license on the ground that the accumulated acid (130 points) exceeds 121 points, which are the criteria for revocation, due to the median of the central line and the drunk driving.

(hereinafter “instant disposition”) D.

On September 17, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an administrative appeal with the Central Administrative Appeals Commission, but the said claim was dismissed on October 28, 2015.

[Ground of Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 7, 8, Eul evidence 1 to 7

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff asserted that the plaintiff was not a substitute driver after the hearing, but the driver was not a substitute driver, and he was found to have been found to have been driving and driving and driving at the center of about 10 meters from the point where the driver was under the influence of the driver when the driver was under the influence of the driver when the driver was under the influence of the driver. The plaintiff was under the influence of the driver when the driver was under the influence of the driver was under the influence of driving and driving at around 10 meters from the point where the driver was under the influence of the driver when the driver was under the influence of the driver was under the influence of the driver. The plaintiff was under the influence of the driver when the driver was under the influence of the driver when the driver was under the influence of the driver's license was under the influence of the driver's license. The execution of the driver's license was revoked prior to the date when the driver was under the influence of the driver's license, and the disposition of this case was revoked and deleted.

arrow