All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal asserts that the defendant's punishment (one year of imprisonment without prison labor) declared by the court below is too unreasonable, while the prosecutor asserts that the sentence of the court below is too unfluent and unfair.

2. Examination of the judgment on the grounds of appeal by both parties, circumstances favorable to the defendant as shown in the arguments and records of this case (the fact that the defendant recognizes the crime of this case and reflects his mistake in depth, the defendant's disability of class 3 is physically disabled, economic situation as a recipient of basic living assistance, and deposit 30 million won in the court below for the victim, additional 2 million won in the court below for the victim even though there is no long-term venture agreement with the court below, it seems that compensation will be paid to his/her bereaved family members because he/she purchased automobile comprehensive insurance, his/her family members and his/her neighbors want to take advantage of the defendant's preference, etc.) and unfavorable circumstances (the crime of this case which resulted in death by shocking the victim who passed the crosswalk pursuant to the pedestrian signals by negligence in violation of the signal) (the crime of this case is highly serious in terms of the content and degree of the violation of the duty of care, the result of the death of the victim is serious, and there are no special reasons to change the defendant's motive and punishment within 2 months following changes in circumstances).