logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.10.26 2017고단3941
사기등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] The Defendant was sentenced to the suspension of execution on September 23, 2016 by the Daejeon District Court of Daejeon for six months of imprisonment due to occupational embezzlement, etc., and the said judgment became final and conclusive on October 1, 2016, and is still under the suspension of execution.

"2017 Highest 3941"

1. On October 14, 2016, at the “D” convenience store located in Gyeyang-gu Incheon, Gyeyang-gu, Incheon, the Defendant is able to enter and withdraw money to the extent that he/she intends to withdraw money from a monthly wage account.

At present, money cannot be withdrawn due to shortage of money, so that it can only be borrowed. The loan made a false statement to the effect that the money will be withdrawn from the monthly wage account and repaid immediately.

However, the Defendant did not have a monthly wage account to withdraw money, and there was no intention or ability to pay the money even if he received money from the injured party, because the Defendant thought that he did gambling in the nearby PC room.

The Defendant received 350,000 won from the seat of the injured party.

2. On October 14, 2016, the Defendant visited the said “D” convenience store again and made a false statement to the said victim stating that “The said victim would have to deposit money in addition to and withdraw money. The Defendant would immediately repay money upon withdrawal.”

However, the Defendant did not have a monthly wage account to withdraw money, and there was no intention or ability to pay the money even if he received money from the injured party, because the Defendant thought that he did gambling in the nearby PC room.

The Defendant received 400,000 won from the seat of the injured party.

3. On October 14, 2016, around 05:22, the Defendant visited the said “D” store again and made a false statement to the said victim stating that “The said victim does not still have to recover the amount remaining at a certain limit. The Defendant would immediately repay the amount upon withdrawal of the money.”

However, it is true.

arrow