Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Switzerland car.

On July 13, 2015, the Defendant driven the above car on the 22:21st day of July, 2015, and turned down five-lanes in front of the shooting distance at the entrance of the Do Office, which is located in the light, from the south Cheongdo to the area of the Do Office.

Since there is a large distance crossing with the signal apparatus, there was a duty to safely drive the vehicle to prevent the accident in advance by driving the vehicle in accordance with the signals.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was at the front part of the Defendant’s driving of the victim C(56) driving, which was left left to the left at the opposite direction due to a sudden fault by entering the yellow Fe-Sk-Sk-Sk-Sk-Sk-Sk-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-k-kn-k-k-k

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, by such occupational negligence, the injury to the victim C, such as salt, tensions, etc. in light of the influence that requires approximately two weeks of treatment, and the injury to the victim E (V, 53 years of age) who was accompanied by the said sprink car, in light of approximately nine weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. A medical certificate (E), a medical certificate (C);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing accident scene photographs;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order recognizes and reflects the Defendant’s mistake, the victim E agree with the victim, the victim C does not want the Defendant’s punishment, there is no criminal history against the Defendant, and the Defendant’s age and sexual behavior are considered.