The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that of the lower court’s punishment (under eight months) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant is against the defendant, the vehicle of the defendant was covered by a comprehensive insurance, and the insurance company paid 20,340,910 won in total with medical expenses for the victim. On December 15, 2014, the defendant deposited 5 million won for the victim on December 15, 2014, and the defendant did not have any record of punishment for the same kind of crime. On the other hand, the crime of this case is not good because the defendant caused a traffic accident due to two gross negligence of the defendant's violation of signal and violation of duty of protection of pedestrians in the crosswalk, and the traffic accident of this case caused a serious injury, such as two dubs for the victim to receive approximately eight weeks of medical treatment. Nevertheless, the victim did not receive a full recovery from damage, and the defendant's severe punishment is disadvantageous, and the defendant's criminal act of this case, the circumstances after the crime of this case, the defendant's age, the circumstances, the circumstances of the defendant's character and behavior, and the reasons for sentencing of this case are not recognized.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.