logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.04.11 2018나66678
물품대금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

[Claim]

Reasons

1. In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings, the following facts can be acknowledged in the entries in Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 6, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2.

On March 21, 2014, the Defendant invested KRW 150 million in E, which the Defendant had been operating in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D (hereinafter “instant place of business”) and jointly operated “F,” which is a universal storage store in the said place of business, between C and C, and the Defendant entered into a partnership agreement (hereinafter “instant partnership agreement”) by checking the operating status of C and allocating operating profits according to its equity ratio.

B. After that, on November 2014, the Defendant and C agreed to register the business of “G” in the name of “F” and to change the business type and trade name from “F,” which is a meat store, around that time. On October 31, 2016, the Defendant agreed to terminate the instant Dong business agreement. However, on October 31, 2016, the Plaintiff continued to pay the Defendant the remainder of KRW 150,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00.

arrow