beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. The plaintiff entered the Army on March 29, 1967. From October 13, 1968 to May 26, 197, the plaintiff was dispatched from Vietnam and served in the 628 Posium 628 Masium 628 Masium. The plaintiff filed an application for registration of persons of distinguished service to the Republic of Korea with the defendant in the year 2002, who was discharged from the military on June 27, 1970. The defendant was recognized as the requirements for registration of persons of distinguished service to the Republic of Korea as the defendant's injury.
B. On August 26, 2015, the Plaintiff asserted that there was an error in hearing due to frequent exposure to explosion at the time of the Vietnam War, and that the Defendant applied for the recognition of additional status to the Defendant as to e-mail and e-mail (hereinafter the following additional application). However, on May 3, 2016, the Defendant rendered a decision that the additional applicant for registration and the e-mail do not constitute the requirements for persons of distinguished service to the State on the ground that the documents submitted cannot identify the cause and the timing of the e-mail, and that the submitted documents alone cannot identify the cause and the timing of the e-mail (hereinafter the instant disposition was conducted).
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 6, Eul evidence 1 to 3, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Determination on the legitimacy of the disposition
A. The plaintiff asserted that the plaintiff was in military service and served as a Vietnam War driver of the 623 Franchise of the Franchise of the Franchise, while performing his duty to transport 155 meters of 155 meters of franchise to the operation place. The plaintiff was exposed to the erose shooting explosion since erose was not received even during the operation, and the erosebs transported 155 meters of 160.7db from 160.7db from 177db from eroseb from 167db from eros, depending on the shooting location. The plaintiff is deemed to have continuously been exposed to the above environment and caused the occurrence of the additional application of this case. However, the disposition of this case on different premise is unlawful.
B. (1) The plaintiff entered the Army on March 29, 1967 with B, and before Vietnam from October 13, 1968 to May 26, 1970.