1. In the trial of the first instance, the final judgment and the further judgment, including a partial exchange change, addition and extension claim.

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The defendant is the Incheon Metropolitan City (hereinafter referred to as "In Incheon Metropolitan City").

) An area in a free economic zone (hereinafter referred to as “permanent area”)

(2) The apartment complex, which is a multi-family housing of 585 households, 8 or more units on the ground of Q29,048.805 square meters in Young-gu, Young-gu, Q29,048.805 square meters (hereinafter “

(2) The Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s succeeding intervenors entered into a sales contract directly with the Defendant or succeed to the status of the buyer (hereinafter “the first buyer and the Defendant”) regarding the apartment of this case. The sales contract between the buyer and the Defendant is called “the sales contract of this case.”

2) During the instant lawsuit, the Plaintiff’s succeeding Intervenor filed an application for succession from Plaintiff J, and the Plaintiff’s succeeding Intervenor L filed an application for succession after succeeding to the rights and obligations under each of the instant sales contract from Plaintiff S., and Plaintiff J and S withdrawn from the instant lawsuit.

Plaintiff

The succeeding intervenor succeeded to 1/2 of the rights and obligations arising from the instant sales contract from Plaintiff AH, and filed an application for succession.

(2) On April 2014, Plaintiff L acquired the claim related to the instant lawsuit from Plaintiff S, and Plaintiff K transferred 1/2 of the damage claim arising from false or exaggerated advertisements from Plaintiff J on April 23, 2014, and Plaintiff AG transferred 1/2 of the damage claim arising from false or exaggerated advertisements from Plaintiff J on April 23, 2014.

3) On February 21, 2013, when the Seoul Central District Court rendered a decision to commence rehabilitation procedures against the Defendant, it designated the Defendant’s representative director AD as a custodian (2013 hap25, and accordingly, AD took over the instant lawsuit. However, the said court rendered a decision to discontinue rehabilitation procedures on May 31, 2013, and the said decision became final and conclusive, and the Defendant took over the instant lawsuit again.

B. The location condition of the apartment site of this case is the case.