1. As to real estate listed in the separate sheet:

A. A sales contract concluded between the Defendant and C on November 14, 2014.

1. The occurrence of the right to revoke the fraudulent act;

A. 1) The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the defendant joining the defendant (hereinafter referred to as the "C") with the Seoul Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D major 161m2 and 161m2, seeking payment of the amount of money and construction cost, etc. borne by the plaintiff in connection with the new construction of 8 households for multi-household housing on the land above 161m2, Seoul Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D major 2008Gahap118783, and C filed a lawsuit with the Seoul Central District Court for unjust enrichment of 2009Gahap31241, as a counterclaim, and on May 20, 2009, the judgment became final and conclusive that "C shall pay to the plaintiff 5% per annum from December 11, 2008 to May 20, 2009, and 20% per annum from the next day to the day of complete payment, and all damages for delay of C's counterclaims are dismissed."

(B) On October 11, 2010, the Seoul Central District Court rendered a judgment to the effect that “A defect in an application for compulsory auction to E with the Seoul Central District Court on the basis of the final judgment of this case shall file a suit of demurrer to the claim of 2010 Gohap51807.” On October 11, 2010, the Seoul Central District Court rendered a judgment to the effect that “A compulsory execution against Plaintiff C with respect to KRW 402,869,312 and KRW 376,510,621 shall not be permitted only to exceed the amount calculated by the rate of 20% per annum from October 12, 2010 to the day of full payment.” On the ground of the final judgment of this case, C appealed appealed appealed appealed appealed, but at the appellate court, it shall withdraw the appeal. The disposal proceeds may only be received by the Plaintiff, which shall only be subject to a judicial compromise, 3014.301, 2014, 2014.