logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2020.11.19 2020누47450
교원소청심사위원회결정취소
Text

The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the part arising from the supplementary participation.

Reasons

The grounds alleged by the plaintiff in the trial while filing an appeal by the court of first instance are not significantly different from the contents alleged by the plaintiff in the court of first instance, and the judgment of the court of first instance dismissing the plaintiff's claim even if the evidence submitted by the court of first instance is re-examined together with the plaintiff

Therefore, the reasoning for the entry of this case is the same as the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the “Japanese Site” in Part 3, Section 18 of the judgment of the court of first instance is deemed to be a “one-time objection”. Thus, it is accepted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow