The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the sentence (3 million won in penalty) imposed by the court below on the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is recognized that the defendant led to the confession of the facts of the crime at the court below, and that the person receiving the basic living security is not suitable for the economic situation, but the defendant was informed of the facts of the accident at the investigative agency despite being informed of the fact of the accident, and there was a criminal record of violation of the Road Traffic Act, the confession of the facts of the crime after the request for a summary order was made, the court below did not have any circumstances that have been changed in the trial due to the overall circumstances, and there was no special circumstance that the defendant determined the punishment against the defendant. In full view of other various circumstances, including the defendant's age, environment, sex, motive for the crime, and circumstances before and after the crime, it is not recognized that the court below's punishment is unfair

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.