beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.
However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Public-private partnership] The Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport operates the system of pre-sale housing fund for workers who lend the pre-sale housing at a lower interest rate than the city without securing the pre-sale housing fund from the National Housing Fund through a financial institution entrusted with the National Housing Fund business to stabilize the housing of homeless workers, etc.
The loan brosers composed of loan broser’s total book, tenant recruitment book, tenant recruitment book, tenant recruitment book, loan broser, etc. using the fact that submission of employment-related documents, such as certificate of employment, etc., and the contract documents related to real estate lease contract, etc., by the financial institution entrusted with the affairs related to the loan of the entire house loan can easily obtain the loan through a formal examination. The loan broser, under the order of the loan broser’s total book, prepares false documents related to employment, such as certificate of employment, payment statement, etc., in the name of a disguised company as if the nominal owner of the loan was actually employed as an employee. The recruitment book of lessors and intermediaries recruited a certified intermediary to prepare a false rental contract to prepare a false real estate lease contract with the owner of the house who will act as a lessor and a false tenant and the false lessor, submitted false documents related to the contract documents related to the above, and made an application for a loan by dividing the loan of the entire house in the name of a false lessee in the financial institution.
[Method] The Defendants, along with the brosker’s loan to the influor of name in the name of the influor, and the facts as to the DB 202 above in the name of the Defendant, even though there was no genuine lease contract between the Defendants, the Defendant A as a fluor, and the lessor B as the lessor.