The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

On October 2013, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 800 square meters of land located in Jeonsung-gun, Jeonsung-gun, D, and E (hereinafter referred to as “new land”); (b) around November 201, the Defendant damaged the victim’s U.S. property at the market price by having G cut down a tree tree nursery, tree tree nursery, tree nursery, and tree nursery in the quantity that the victim F laid away from the land around November 201.

Defendant

In addition, from 2007 to 2008, from 2007 to 2008, the Defendant leased and cultivated the instant land, and after the second half of 201, the Defendant neglected to disclose his intention to waive the farming.

Therefore, at the time of the operation of the digging pool as above, it was a situation in which it was impossible to find out whether there is a tree at this point because the miscellaneous grass was higher than the height of the person.

Even if there were seedlings in this place, since it was left alone for two years as above, there was no property value as a tree, and further, the defendant had never been aware of whether there was a tree.

In full view of each testimony of F, H, I, G, and J as well as each evidence submitted, the following facts can be recognized:

In other words, from 2007 to 2008, F leased and cultivated this land from the Defendant from around 2007 to 2008, but the Defendant paid the amount of 200,000 won per annum to be paid to the Defendant for the three graves of the Defendant.

② From the end of the second half of the year in 2011, F did not pay the Defendant the difference, did not have the beginning of a grave, and the Defendant knew of the renunciation of cultivation of the instant land between September and July 2011.

③ On October 2013, 2013, the Defendant: (a) ordered Gman to remove the miscellaneous land of this case from the miscellaneous land by using the clicker; and (b) G to sloping land accordingly.

The key issue of the instant case is whether the F seedlings was actually planted on the instant land and whether the Defendant was so cut off as above.