The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. The summary of the facts charged by the Defendant was Pakistan-ro 2 A, Jongno-gu, Seoul Jongno-gu, Jongno-gu, on September 1975, 1975, and at the Park Park, the Defendant showed that D only espionage was sprinked when she was under 62 years in the Republic of Seodaemun-gu, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, and that D was receiving benefits by putting the highest floor of the government in a non-spons and kept in custody, and that D was receiving benefits by putting D's high-ranking clothes and kept in custody, which was included in E's mother, and the government sent D with white age without serving D.

In order to get the U.S. military, the U.S. government promulgated false facts to the effect that the U.S. military was discovered to the U.S. military, and that the U.S. military would go to the G. H. C.I., thereby spreading a will visa.

2. Case progress

A. On May 25, 1976, the Seoul District Court found the Defendant guilty on the grounds that the facts charged in the instant case against the Defendant violated the Presidential Emergency Decree No. 9 for the National Security and the Protection of Public Order, and sentenced the Defendant to two years of imprisonment, suspension of qualifications, and suspension of execution three years of suspension of execution. The above judgment became final and conclusive as it is.

B. In this regard, the Constitutional Court decided on March 21, 2013 by the Constitutional Court Decision 70, 132 (Joint) and 170 (Joint) that the Presidential Emergency Measure No. 9 for the protection of national security and public order violates the Constitution. The Supreme Court also ruled that the Supreme Court’s decision made on April 18, 201 by the collegiate body of 689 early 201 was unconstitutional and invalid.

(c)

On January 2, 2018, a prosecutor filed a petition for a new trial with respect to the instant judgment subject to a new trial. On March 16, 2018, this court rendered a decision to commence a new trial, and the said decision to commence a new trial became final and conclusive as is.

3. In a case where the statutes on punishment retroactively lose its effect due to the Constitutional Court’s decision of unconstitutionality, or the court declares that the said statutes are unconstitutional, the court shall render a judgment of not guilty in accordance with Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act with respect to the defendant's case prosecuted

B. The laws and regulations on punishment are applicable to ASEAN.