logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2019.08.20 2018가단21479
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is a corporation specializing in the construction of officetels and the construction of housing.

B. The Defendant is the owner of a new Etel on the ground D in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu.

C. On October 12, 2016, the Defendant obtained approval for the instant Etel construction work.

On September 30, 2016, the Plaintiff concluded a sales contract with the Defendant to purchase the instant officetel F in KRW 131,070,000, and received the registration of ownership transfer on December 22, 2016.

E. On December 20, 2016, the Plaintiff concluded a sales contract with the Defendant to purchase the instant officetel G from KRW 132,670,000, and received the registration of ownership transfer on January 23, 2017.

[Grounds for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 and 2, each of the entries in Gap evidence 1 and 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's ground of claim

A. In order to sell the instant officetel, the Defendant employed many people by paying a considerable amount of allowances when the sales contract was sexually dead.

(hereinafter, this case's seller). (b)

The Defendant promised that the instant seller will build the instant officetel’s “studio” prior to the completion of the instant officetel, and promised that the instant officetel’s “H department store building will soon start in the vicinity of the instant officetel.”

(hereinafter, this case’s commitments and commitments). C.

The instant seller promoted to the Plaintiff that the price of the instant officetel would rise significantly after the Plaintiff purchased the instant officetel. D.

The instant promise and undertaking of the seller did not comply with all of the instant promise and undertaking of the seller.

E. The Plaintiff, as above, beliefed the instant undertaking and undertaking that were not observed, is the instant officetel G heading KRW 132,670,000 at a low price, namely, the instant officetel F heading from the Defendant, with the introduction of the Plaintiff, who is the seller of the instant case.

arrow