A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 9, 2106, at the subway station located in Seo-gu Daejeon, Daejeon, Daejeon on the 20:09, the Defendant was leading to the service office of the victim E (39 years old) of the Service Center in order to help the Defendant, who was under the influence of alcohol, was taking a breath of the subway station, and led the Defendant to the service office. On the other hand, the Defendant took the face of the victim F (51 years old), the public interest service personnel G (19 years old, the above service personnel E, and the above service personnel) to remove the Defendant, and walk the parts of the subway station with the bucks of the victim E (the above service personnel E, the above service personnel E, and the two persons) with the bucks of the 39 years old victim E (the 39 years old victim E).

As a result, the Defendant inflicted injury on the 14-day base on the victim E (39 tax) of the Service Center for 14-day clocks, tensions, etc., on the victim F, and on the part of the victim F for 14-day clocks in need of medical treatment, respectively, and assaulted the victim G (19 years) of the public duty personnel.

2. The Defendant interfering with the business at the time and place described in paragraph 1, and at the same time and at the same time, “Neine” was committed against the victims.

2.3 6.20

Does the work be done on the bals of money;

Chewing gushes, flags, flags, and “packers” are equally the same years of age

15 minutes have passed through 15 minutes, such as taking a bath with a large sound.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the work, such as customer guidance, ticketing, opening opening, etc. of victims by force.

3. On June 9, 2016, at around 20:25, the Defendant: (a) expressed a desire to see the circumstances of the instant case to the Defendant, where the Defendant, who was a policeman belonging to the Daejeon Police Station, who was called up after receiving a report of 112 of the above C (39 years old) at the place indicated in paragraph (1) at around 20:25; (b) expressed a desire to see that “I am fested, but I am feasible,” and assaulted the Defendant at his hand when I am satis.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning 112 report processing.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to E and I;

1.Written statements of G and F