logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.04.06 2017고정1799
무고
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 30, 2017, the Defendant drafted a false complaint against B with the aim of having B criminal punishment, at a mutual infinite legal office located in a non-commercial and French domicile of Gwangju or lower level.

The accusation of the Defendant C had no fact that the Defendant C was sealed by the Defendant on February 17, 2017, and that “The Defendant C was punished because he was sealed with the Defendant’s hand floor around February 17, 2017.” The facts did not change the Defendant B.

Nevertheless, on May 30, 2017, the Defendant submitted the above complaint to the police officer who is unable to know his name in the public service center of the Seoul Northern District Police Station located in Gwangju Northern District, and filed the complaint and filed the complaint with the police officer B.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness B and C;

1. Statement made by the police and the prosecutor against the defendant;

1. Investigation report (Submission of data, such as confirmation of release from entry and discharge of a victim A), investigation report (Attachment of data on the details of medical care benefits of a victim A);

1. Complaint;

1. From February 17, 2017 to February 20, 2017, the defendant assaulted B from February 17, 2017;

3.6. That he was hospitalized until 6.

The argument is asserted.

Nevertheless, before filing the instant complaint after February 17, 2017, there is no circumstance that the Defendant brought a problem against B or his husband C with respect to the fact of injury regardless of the way it is difficult to find out. Moreover, even in the notice of delivery by content-certified mail to B on April 3, 2017, it is only the fact that the Defendant demanded the payment of ‘health-subsidized food return', and there is no mentioning the fact of injury. Thus, it is difficult to accept in light of the Defendant’s ordinary attitude in the process of demanding return of health-subsidized food return to B or C.

In full view of these circumstances, the facts of accusation stated in the facts of crime are recognized as false.

application of the laws and regulations

1. Article 156 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

arrow