1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B delivers the real estate listed in Section 2 of the Schedule of Attached Property 2;

B. Defendant C.

1. The judgment on the cause of the claim between the plaintiff, defendant B, and D may be deemed to have been led to the confession of the above Defendants pursuant to Article 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act. The plaintiff and defendant C shall be deemed to have not disputed the facts stated in the grounds of the attachment.

Therefore, Defendant B is obligated to deliver each real estate listed in paragraph (2) of the attached Table 2, Defendant C is obligated to deliver each real estate listed in paragraph (4) of the attached Table 2, and Defendant D is obligated to deliver each real estate listed in paragraph (5) of the attached Table

2. Defendant C’s assertion that the acceptance ruling was not made, and that it was impossible to respond to the Plaintiff’s claim due to the Plaintiff’s failure to receive business compensation from the Plaintiff. However, in light of the evidence Nos. 7 and evidence Nos. 8-2, the Gyeonggi-do Regional Land Tribunal decided on Oct. 29, 2018 on Dec. 13, 2018; the commencement date of expropriation was 39,250,000 won; the Plaintiff’s deposited the business compensation money to Defendant C on Nov. 23, 2016; thus, Defendant C’s above assertion is without merit.

3. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the ground that the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified.