The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the reasons for appeal (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of the following factors: (a) the Defendant showed an attitude against his mistake; (b) the fact that part of the amount of damage was returned to the victim C, etc., which may be considered by the Defendant; (c) most of the damage was not recovered; (d) three times including the punishment imposed by the same fraud; and (e) the Defendant’s age, sex, family environment, motive and background of the crime; (d) the means and consequence of the crime; and (e) the application of the sentencing guidelines by the Supreme Court sentencing committee, including the circumstances before and after the crime, etc., it is not deemed that the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.